NAP with TSSQ

Duhast des SSQ a posté sur leur partie privée. Je ne sais pas trop quoi en penser. Ils sont tout près de moi entre autre et je ne connais même pas encore la liste complète de leurs joueurs...

Du coup je n'ai pas encore voté. J'attend de voir s'ils sont beaucoup et leur dispo...

Here is finally +/- them list :

duhast
seiryu
edeleweiss
arteriel
throrondor
Parmenides
corrunha
VonBismarck

In fact they are all just next to us, on the west side. As we have already all the systems on our right who are filling quick by AA and TGT, I think it's a good idea to NAP SSQ as soon as they have created them tag!

Cause war against TGT and AA is arriving very sson I think...

Don't forget to vote please!

OK

that SSQ alliance is not existent yet
some of them are red for what reason ever

how can we decide about NAP right now???

i´m new here and don´t know about your way to decide things but i guess it´s not the right moment for that decision

Duhast wrote:

Here you have our list member (more or less)

duhast
seiryu
edeleweiss
arteriel
throrondor
Parmenides
corrunha
VonBismarck

As Demon is not in the list members, I vote to take his planets

Otteson wrote:

that SSQ alliance is not existent yet
some of them are red for what reason ever

how can we decide about NAP right now???

i´m new here and don´t know about your way to decide things but i guess it´s not the right moment for that decision

They don't have alliance? Why not incorpore them totaly to create a big one?

pierrovitch wrote:

They don't have alliance? Why not incorpore them totaly to create a big one?

+1

It could be a very great idea and reinforce us! I contact duhast by PM!

they were UTP in G4 &5
and SSQ since G1
sound not good for me

yinchekhsia wrote:

they were UTP in G4 &5
and SSQ since G1
sound not good for me

Why? You and Otteson were not BONO last round! Or you find that's dangerous for BONO to recruit a lot of people of same alliance?
I propose it because that seems that they have problem with TAG and they are in good a good position close of us. It s possible that they prefere wait tag, but i think that the situation start to be not easy for them. But maybe you know these guys beter than us and have a good advise?

For infos, they are fighter and have a trader fighter (speedfighter) more...

pierrovitch wrote:

...that seems that they have problem with TAG and they are in good a good position close of us...For infos, they are fighter and have a trader fighter (speedfighter) more...

+1..

pas un bon souvenir, je demande des précisions à mes anciens alliés, je veux rien dire sans être sur

edit
bon renseignement pris en G5
les Ao les ont soupsonné d'avoir hacké leur forum, fait résign un de leur membres, trouvé des pp à foison assez pour reconstruire des flottes enormes pour contrer celle AO

les admin les avaient mis sous surveillance et étaient d'accord pour penser qu'il y avait du louche dans leur façon de jouer sans arriver à rien prouver.
A la fin de la gold, le leader SG1 à subitement resign, ce qui est passé pour un aveu des tricheries.
enfin tout ça c des soupsons ya pas eu de preuves, et perso j'ai pas été en face d'eux

in english for ottesson
in G5 UTP was near AO, and AO think they was hacker and cheater.
they think one utp hack the AO forum
they think one UTP make resign one AO
Admin think that utp sound not good, but not sure
at the end the utp leader resign (SG1) and all the french community think it's because he was a cheater

i'm not sure they are or were cheater
just sound not good

and now that

duhast green
seiryu green
edeleweiss red
arteriel ???
throrondor green
Parmenides green
corrunha green
VonBismarck red

2 red on 8 members alliance
sound not good
ça sent pas bon c tout

i think Otteson is right, it's not time to nap them

these news change my point of view of the question...

Nevermind, they want to keep them tag! So the discussion about a possible integration of them members is over.

But we still need to talk about a possible NAP. OK, they probably made a lot of mistakes in the past, but don't you think it's a better idea to have them with us than against? AA and TGT are very close now and if we stay alone with only SL and KoN, we'll not resist a long time!...

So, as everything changed and to let all people vote with all these news, I've deleted the old Poll and heve made a new... Please vote!

Personaly, I keep my YES!

Quote :

duhast wrote:

Hi!!

We decided to mantain SSQ TAG.

I see that SL and BONO have a NAP. Our proposition is to sign a NAP with SL and BONO. And together we can resist (or attack) AA and TGT.

Here you have a gift from SSQ :

[TGT] beester15

Intelligence Report
Biology 12
Economy 10
Energy 9
Mathematics 11
Physics 11
Social 12
Trade Revenue 0%
Race Summary

* -28% growth (-4)
* +16% science (+2)
* -16% culture (-4)
* +0% production (+0)
* +34% speed (+2)
* +52% attack (+4)
* +0% defense (+0)

This is only a little gift :wink:

We can assign a few systems (or players ) to each alliance to kill or to defend.

What do you think about it?

Marc

Hi!

No problem with your decision! :wink:

I personaly (and the most of BONO) want to sign a NAP with you. But we are still discussing about it internaly (your 2 red players seem strange to some of us) and we'll tell you our official answer as soon as you have created your tag.

I was more thinking about try to resist against TGT and/or AA than to attack them! I think they will hurt badly all of us!!!

Regards,

Steph

if they ask nap, it's possible they don't cheat
but anyone ask them why there is 2 red player ?
(estce que quelqu'un a demandé pourquoi ils avait 2 status red ?)

I don't think they cheat!

Here is your answer about them red status. I've posted it in SSQ Embassy on 30/01 :

Duhast wrote:

Please ... do not fire against edelweiss and VonBismarck, both are SSQ members.

And they are not multi, both are demanding to AccAdmin to reopen SSQ alliance and he (it) blocked them ... sad, very sad.

Can we confirm a NAP?

https://beachorknation.forum2jeux.com/Embassies-f2/SSQ-Embassy-f13/Welcome-t413.htm

We have arlready had this kind of problem in BONO (stef, rrfirebird and me work in same society)...

They finally got them tag!
Still some votes missing!... Please hurry up, if you don't have any objection, I say them yes for the nap at midnight!

okay for me..But I don't know this guys..

Our futur ennemy is suffisant... i'm ok.

yes war with AA is on air
nap this guy

Hohooo! I see that everybody has answer! Good!
So we're now naped with them!

Pierro, can you add them to our list please?
I contact duhast to tell him our answer.

Done!

there´s something wrong with our nap list
it says we are napped with ssq but that alliance is not existent

i guess we are napped instead with tssq